Am I wrong in thinking the advantages and SD's at + 1 wouldn't really change at all and the big thing might be the frequencies? Without being exact about it, could you guess, if I had to guess, I could halve the frequency at TC +1 in this case in this case on the assumption that, compared to if I played all hands, I would recover from a count lesser than TC+1 half the time? Would that be a bad, maybe too simplistic of a guess?Īfterall, I suppose sometimes, if I could sit there every round, sometimes it would go TC-1 and could still recover to TC+2. I've always thought the main thing is, in this case, maybe like you are saying, the frequencies of rounds at +1 would change alot from the frequencies in Don's tables. In other words, I will stop playing at +0.9. So, say now I'm the same player, sitting there able to play any round I want, choose to only to begin to play at +2 but will never leave unless the TC drops below +1.
And if the next round throws it into +1.9 Where, I assume, it assumes one can just sit there and play a round anytime the count is, say, +2. Keep in mind all I can barely understand are the 'back-counting' spreads from Don's book. Click to expand.I have so many questions on this lol.
